http://eatocracy.cnn.com/2011/06/23/does-4-h-desensitize-kids-to-killing/?hpt=hp_bn8
I'm so outraged by this I can't even think what to say. To attack 4-H like this is just
despicable, and what's more the people attacking haven't even been in 4-H. Now, I don't raise live stock, but I know people who do and to say that they are "desensitized" and basically calling them murderers is slanderous and appalling. 4-H teaches kids the humane and ethical way of raising animals, something we need in a society where most of our meat comes from inhumane factory farms! Kids in 4-H learn much more than raising animals. They meet new people, new friends, learn social skills, learn work skills, and teaches them about the world around them. Overall, 4-H is about helping kids be the best they can be, "to make the best better". Maybe if the commenters were in 4-H they wouldn't be so close-minded and ignorant. The fact is that slaughter is part of raising and animal. It has been a part of human culture since homo sapiens transitioned from hunter-gathers to farmers (without which, civilization never would have started). We are omnivores and require both meat and vegetables to get our essential amino acids, to survive. If you don't want to eat meat and supplement your amino acid intake other ways, that's fine it's your opinion. If you feel that you can't raise animals for food, that's perfectly fine too. But you can't force your opinion on others and attack an organization that you know absolutely nothing about. It is simply bigoted, slanderous, disgraceful, cruel, and shameful.
So this blog has really evolved over the years. It started out as an assignment for my high school journalism classes. Now I kinda want to start it up again. I'm not sure what I'm gonna write and I doubt anyone will even read it, but it sounds like fun. So strap in and enjoy the crazy out of control train that is my brain. WARNING: The content below is extremely random and poorly written. Proceed at own risk.
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Boisterous Bruins Celebrate in Boston, Callous Canucks Burn City
They did it! The Bruins are bring home a Stanley Cup for their fans, the first since 1972! The game was a shutout; 4-0 Bruins. It was an exciting, heart pounding game and even I found myself, who has never ever watched hockey before, unable to tear myself away.
Fans in Boston's took to the streets. Jumping up and down, screaming, yelling, and shooting off fireworks. Even in the small towns across Massachusetts people were honking hours, yelling, and giving impromptu fireworks displays. Boston can't wait for their Bruins to come home so they can see them riding down the street atop the Duck Boats.
However, I think its important to note that although Boston got rowdy it never got violent. A few people who had partied a little to hard, may have been asked to leave by police, but for the most part fans behaved themselves. As one local news reporter said, "It's just good old fashioned celebrating."
It was a very different story in Vancouver where some fans were so distraught that they took out their anger by destroying property. It was on the verge of a riot. At one point people were jumping over a giant bonfire. How much of a sore looser do you have to be to do that? More importantly how stupid do you have to be? Other fans were disappointed but congratulated the Bruins any way and started looking forward to the cup next year. One woman decked out in her Canuck fan gear jumped in front of a news camera and screamed, "We still love you!!". That's a faithful fan; that's how the rest of Vancouver should have been acting. Instead they booed, screamed bloody murder, and tore apart their own town. Where's your dignity? Where's your pride? Come on Canucks, grow up.
Fans in Boston's took to the streets. Jumping up and down, screaming, yelling, and shooting off fireworks. Even in the small towns across Massachusetts people were honking hours, yelling, and giving impromptu fireworks displays. Boston can't wait for their Bruins to come home so they can see them riding down the street atop the Duck Boats.
However, I think its important to note that although Boston got rowdy it never got violent. A few people who had partied a little to hard, may have been asked to leave by police, but for the most part fans behaved themselves. As one local news reporter said, "It's just good old fashioned celebrating."
It was a very different story in Vancouver where some fans were so distraught that they took out their anger by destroying property. It was on the verge of a riot. At one point people were jumping over a giant bonfire. How much of a sore looser do you have to be to do that? More importantly how stupid do you have to be? Other fans were disappointed but congratulated the Bruins any way and started looking forward to the cup next year. One woman decked out in her Canuck fan gear jumped in front of a news camera and screamed, "We still love you!!". That's a faithful fan; that's how the rest of Vancouver should have been acting. Instead they booed, screamed bloody murder, and tore apart their own town. Where's your dignity? Where's your pride? Come on Canucks, grow up.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
On the Grid

Just yesterday I finally gave into my friend's pleading and set up a tumblr account. (Don't get me wrong, I'm already addicted. It's the perfect way to satisfy my criminal minds obsession :P) But, it got me thinking. I probably have over 20 accounts on the internet. I have a facebook, a yahoo, a tumblr, a blogger, an iTunes, tons of accounts for college websites, and countless other accounts (such as on Taylor Swift's website, Owl City's app, abc.com, dogchannel.com, playlist.com the list just goes on)
How many of these accounts do I actually use? I only check the first five daily, the rest I haven't been on in weeks, months, or even years. Do I remember their passwords? Nope not really. Will they just stay there forever? Probably, yeah.
It's been said the internet is forever, and I'm just wondering how much of a digital trail I'm leaving behind.
Monday, June 13, 2011
Student Death Sentence
Your sitting is small, stuffy room. Your scared stiff and from looking around you can see that everyone else in the room is just as terrified. Suddenly you hear heavy footsteps approaching you, you see a dark body leaning over you. SLAP! A packet of paper drops heavily onto your desk. That's right its the dreaded Summer Reading Assignment.
We've all been through it, and some of us are going through it now. Students are forced to read assigned books over the summer and complete assignments on them. For some, it is simply an unpleasant task that needs to get done. These kids don't let the assignments taint their love of reading. For most however, summer reading and school assignments is like a death sentence, one that obliterates any interest in reading.
The problem with Summer reading is that its structure sabotages its purpose. It is meant to foster a love of reading, especially in younger students. However, by choosing the books for the students teachers are instead fostering contempt for reading. Imagine this: you walk into a bookstore looking for a good read. Suddenly, an employee walks up to you and says, "I'm sorry, but you can only buy one of these twenty approved books." What if you were not interested in any of the books? What if there was a book that you really wanted to read that wasn't on that list? Would you be angry? Would ever come back to that store? Well that's how most students feel about Summer Reading and they apply those feeling of frustration and anger towards all books and reading.
My suggestion is that instead of offering a limited list of required titles, teachers should offer suggestions. How hard would it be to say, "OK you assignment is to choose a book that is 200 pages long, read it over the summer, and make a poster, movie, or power point about it." This way, teachers know the kids are reading at their level while the kids feel in control and enjoy reading about a topic of their choice. I understand, at the high school level at least one classic has to be read to jump start the curriculum, but the free reading book still needs to be fun.
Until, teachers, librarians, and principles realize the flaws of summer reading the book hatred epidemic will continue to spread. Case in point, almost 75% of my Honors 11 English class rarely opens a book, including those assigned during the school year. It's time to turn the page in summer reading and start a new chapter in which the characters are bookworm students.
We've all been through it, and some of us are going through it now. Students are forced to read assigned books over the summer and complete assignments on them. For some, it is simply an unpleasant task that needs to get done. These kids don't let the assignments taint their love of reading. For most however, summer reading and school assignments is like a death sentence, one that obliterates any interest in reading.
The problem with Summer reading is that its structure sabotages its purpose. It is meant to foster a love of reading, especially in younger students. However, by choosing the books for the students teachers are instead fostering contempt for reading. Imagine this: you walk into a bookstore looking for a good read. Suddenly, an employee walks up to you and says, "I'm sorry, but you can only buy one of these twenty approved books." What if you were not interested in any of the books? What if there was a book that you really wanted to read that wasn't on that list? Would you be angry? Would ever come back to that store? Well that's how most students feel about Summer Reading and they apply those feeling of frustration and anger towards all books and reading.
My suggestion is that instead of offering a limited list of required titles, teachers should offer suggestions. How hard would it be to say, "OK you assignment is to choose a book that is 200 pages long, read it over the summer, and make a poster, movie, or power point about it." This way, teachers know the kids are reading at their level while the kids feel in control and enjoy reading about a topic of their choice. I understand, at the high school level at least one classic has to be read to jump start the curriculum, but the free reading book still needs to be fun.
Until, teachers, librarians, and principles realize the flaws of summer reading the book hatred epidemic will continue to spread. Case in point, almost 75% of my Honors 11 English class rarely opens a book, including those assigned during the school year. It's time to turn the page in summer reading and start a new chapter in which the characters are bookworm students.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)